On Feb 2, 2012, at 7:27 PM, Lawson English wrote:
> I apparently misread some of the papers. I can't find mention of how Morphic
> was ported, though the ability to use smalltalk inside an LK morph suggests
> that there is some expectation of reuse of code or perhaps they simply wanted
> Smalltalk programmers to feel more comfortable with LK morphs from the start.
>
When I looked at the first LK release I was very disappointed. Why do the same
than in Squeak? If you do the same you can just use Squeak, not fight against
JS to get the same... "I did the same but in JavaScript". Why? I never
understood the goal of LK, I have to admit.
I thought that they would have moved on in the meantime. If not, this is a huge
mistake. Morphic needs to be redone, not ported to Javascript 1-to-1.
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
