Am 20.02.2012 21:30, schrieb Nicolas Cellier:
Le 20 février 2012 21:18, Frank Shearar<[email protected]> a écrit :
On 20 February 2012 19:41, Guido Stepken<[email protected]> wrote:
Am 20.02.2012 10:22, schrieb Edgar J. De Cleene:
Yesterday in a response to Craig I said have a Cuis with a wiki on top and
this .image is 5 mb and run on a “modern” G4 400 mhz PowerMac.
That’s is a beauty and the power of Cuis, thanks Juan for your reduced image
of 2 mb
Looks nice.
World menu -> appearance -> set desktop color -> Error
What i - never ever - understand is, why - when Smalltalk is a reflective
language and there are so mighty tools - like Moose - out there, able to
search the whole codebase for possible occurrences of "message not
understood"?????
This is just a trivial application of the solution to the Halting
Problem (left as an exercise for the reader).
Or: if you want to avoid MNU, don't use a dynamically typed language.
What, what, the right development process wouldn't solve such a
trivial problem ?
Guido, try to inspect yourself with all your introspection tools and
development process know how, because I have the feeling that despite
the many answers you got, you still face a message not understood
problem ;)
Nicolas
There *is* a possibility to check, if there is some sender sending
something, that a receiver cannot understand.
NONSENSE!
Do it, develop the development process, insure quality in the code!!!
Have fun!
Guido Stepken
