A true don quixote of modern times fighting the endless mills of the halting problem
again you made my day :D On 2012-02-20, at 23:01, Guido Stepken wrote: > Am 20.02.2012 21:30, schrieb Nicolas Cellier: >> Le 20 février 2012 21:18, Frank Shearar<[email protected]> a écrit : >>> On 20 February 2012 19:41, Guido Stepken<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Am 20.02.2012 10:22, schrieb Edgar J. De Cleene: >>>> >>>> Yesterday in a response to Craig I said have a Cuis with a wiki on top and >>>> this .image is 5 mb and run on a “modern” G4 400 mhz PowerMac. >>>> >>>> That’s is a beauty and the power of Cuis, thanks Juan for your reduced >>>> image >>>> of 2 mb >>>> >>>> >>>> Looks nice. >>>> >>>> World menu -> appearance -> set desktop color -> Error >>>> >>>> What i - never ever - understand is, why - when Smalltalk is a reflective >>>> language and there are so mighty tools - like Moose - out there, able to >>>> search the whole codebase for possible occurrences of "message not >>>> understood"????? >>> This is just a trivial application of the solution to the Halting >>> Problem (left as an exercise for the reader). >>> >>> Or: if you want to avoid MNU, don't use a dynamically typed language. >>> >> What, what, the right development process wouldn't solve such a >> trivial problem ? >> Guido, try to inspect yourself with all your introspection tools and >> development process know how, because I have the feeling that despite >> the many answers you got, you still face a message not understood >> problem ;) >> >> Nicolas > > There *is* a possibility to check, if there is some sender sending something, > that a receiver cannot understand. > > NONSENSE! > > Do it, develop the development process, insure quality in the code!!! > > Have fun! > > Guido Stepken >
