On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Feb 25, 2012, at 5:20 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> Excellent! >> Pavel >> We should add Pharo Kernel as dependent of the head so that we get immediate >> feedback like that. >> because this is really great. >> > > It already is configured to be build after every update: > > https://ci.lille.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo%20Kernel%201.4/ > > tests, too: > > https://ci.lille.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo%20Kernel%20Tests/ > > Now we need to take action when it breaks...
Of course it is always much better if the author of the patch can see that it caused some problem than when some other person must later investigate what patch of an update has evil side effect. I hardly need to tell you that it is very demotivating to wait what next will break something again (as this week one single update fixed one issue and brought the next one). Instead of improving of the system we must spend a lot of energy on maintenance. We definitely must improve the QA process. -- Pavel > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de > >
