>> Of course it is always much better if the author of the patch can see >> that it caused some problem than when some other person must later >> investigate what patch of an update has evil side effect. >> >> I hardly need to tell you that it is very demotivating to wait what >> next will break something again (as this week one single update fixed >> one issue and brought the next one). Instead of improving of the >> system we must spend a lot of energy on maintenance. >> >> We definitely must improve the QA process. > > To support my lemmenting I must say that the state of non-failing > kernel jobs lasted only 10 hours. :-)
Excellent! :) Seriously it means that we should work on rules checking so that we identify the violations. People used tests for that now as soon as we have small lint we should be able to express architecture rules. Stef
