sorry, but i didn't get it

On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I actually tried the code, but I cannot figure out what I should look at.
> Could you perhaps be more explicit in what the original issue is?
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On 11 Mar 2012, at 21:25, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>
> > On 11 March 2012 20:43, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mar 11, 2012, at 8:25 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 11 March 2012 18:30, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>> should we integrated that?
> >>>>
> >>> i posted it here so people can evaluate.
> >>>
> >>> for me it is not a question :)
> >>
> >> you lost me but I guess that you mean yes.
> >>
> > well, since i spent time implementing it, it would be surprise if i
> > will say 'no'.
> > but it looks like this is not important to people, since nobody
> > replied to this post except you.
> >
> > But of course, we could make this behavior optional, controlled via
> settings.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Igor Stasenko.
> >
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Being happy is a matter of choice."
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to