On 12 March 2012 06:16, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Ok, I took a look. > > Please do not integrate this as it is. Here are my reasons: > - TextMorphs are supposed to be used for other things than source code, and > for non-experienced-smalltalk-programmers, this would be quite alien. > - You already have a reasonably similar functionality with Ctrl pressed. This > functionality is the same as in other editors on your machine, which brings > familiarity. It would be better to have your functionality added to the Ctrl > one.
Yeah, except that i cannot use it, because Apple , on Lion thinks that it is better to use Ctrl-left/ctrl-right for switching between "full screen apps", whatever it means.. It looks that Apple doesn't fears about alienating text-editor users by changing key bindings. > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 12 Mar 2012, at 03:58, Igor Stasenko wrote: > >> On 12 March 2012 03:50, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote: >>> sorry for not explaining the feature properly.. >>> >>> I just wanna ask, what do you think, it we're going to integrate that: >>> a) should it be optional or we can use it by default? >>> b) if it is optional, what is default setting on/off? >>> >>> I vote for (a).. Because: >> ^^^ >> a) as not-optional :) >> >>> What i finding hard is imagining situation, where old behavior will be >>> less time consuming/more appropriate. >>> Can anyone can come up with cons arguments? >>> >>> While is important to fully control each whitespace character(s) >>> separately, when you editing/typing text (as in languages like Python >>> they even make it part of syntax... (what a stupid idea.. can't resist >>> sorry)), for navigating the text an importance of stepping over every >>> whitespace character seems to be leaning to zero.. (well, at least in >>> my eyes). >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Igor Stasenko. >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Igor Stasenko. >> > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Quality cannot be an afterthought." > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
