Stephan Eggermont wrote > > Don't you think it would be much less work > to port Christian Haider's work to Pharo? The namespace extensions to ring > should > be helpful to make two-way changes from both the VW and Pharo side. >
I was thinking the same thing. The usual Smalltalk duplication of effort seems to have been taken to new heights with PDF libs ;-) I totally understand the enthusiasm, because I really want it to (although more viewing than generating)! I looked at doing the port at ESUG last year, but hit the namespace wall... Sean p.s. I was reading the Cairo website the other day and PDF is one of the "output targets". Could that be helpful here? -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Artefact-a-PDF-framework-tp4585877p4603431.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
