On 2 May 2012 16:53, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Stephan Eggermont wrote
>>
>> Don't you think it would be much less work
>> to port Christian Haider's work to Pharo? The namespace extensions to ring
>> should
>> be helpful to make two-way changes from both the VW and Pharo side.
>>
>
> I was thinking the same thing. The usual Smalltalk duplication of effort
> seems to have been taken to new heights with PDF libs ;-) I totally
> understand the enthusiasm, because I really want it to (although more
> viewing than generating)! I looked at doing the port at ESUG last year, but
> hit the namespace wall...
>
> Sean
>
> p.s. I was reading the Cairo website the other day and PDF is one of the
> "output targets". Could that be helpful here?

yes, you are right..
http://www.cairographics.org/manual/cairo-PDF-Surfaces.html

>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://forum.world.st/Artefact-a-PDF-framework-tp4585877p4603431.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.

Reply via email to