David T. Lewis wrote > > But it seems to me > that it would be vastly simpler to just use a definition that is already > agreed and documented (i.e. Posix epoch), and leave the "Smalltalk epoch" > behind as an interesting historical artifact. >
I created an issue... Issue 5913: Remove Squeak epoch http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5913 -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Epoch-returns-local-offset-tp4630549p4630604.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
