Am 17.05.2012 um 05:48 schrieb "Sean P. DeNigris" <[email protected]>:
> > David T. Lewis wrote >> >> But it seems to me >> that it would be vastly simpler to just use a definition that is already >> agreed and documented (i.e. Posix epoch), and leave the "Smalltalk epoch" >> behind as an interesting historical artifact. >> > > I created an issue... > Issue 5913: Remove Squeak epoch > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5913 > Great Sean, I've this on my todo sheet for a long time now. I started multiple times fixing things but never finished because there is loads to do. So let's join efforts. @David That is a good proposal to base calculation on posix epoch. I blindly assumed smalltalk epoch is wrong. So I better read the specs before changing DateAndTime>>#midnight Norbert > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Epoch-returns-local-offset-tp4630549p4630604.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
