On 1 June 2012 17:58, Esteban A. Maringolo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Chris Cunningham wrote >> >> I have cases where I have multiple background processes going on that >> occassionally wake up, and in that case, I really, really appreciate >> the stacking progress bars - I can tell that one (or more) background >> processes have kicked off. This isn't quite 'nesting', although I >> think it uses some of the same features. >> >> As long as some result out of this discussion doesn't remove that >> capability, I agree with what you are saying. > > +1. > > If the progress tracks something that happens in the background with no > direct impact to the workflow (such as uploading/downloading something), I'm > ok to have a separate out-of-bounds bar. > > If the progress is modal,
then someone should stop programming and pick other activity in his life, like organizing the queue during hot sales in supermarket :) > it is... > I need to wait until it finishes, I think > it should be as it is now. > > Regards, > > Esteban. > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/What-i-would-like-to-have-instead-of-progress-bar-tp4632707p4632794.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
