On 1 June 2012 21:54, Nicolas Cellier
<[email protected]> wrote:
> 2012/6/1 Esteban A. Maringolo <[email protected]>:
>>
>> Igor Stasenko wrote
>>>
>>> On 1 June 2012 17:58, Esteban A. Maringolo &lt;emaringolo@&gt; wrote:
>>>> If the progress tracks something that happens in the background with no
>>>> direct impact to the workflow (such as uploading/downloading something),
>>>> I'm
>>>> ok to have a separate out-of-bounds bar.
>>>>
>>>> If the progress is modal,
>>>
>>> then someone should stop programming and pick other activity in his life,
>>> like organizing the queue during hot sales in supermarket :)
>>>
>>
>> Touché.
>>
>> But I was thinking in short, less than 20 sec, modal tasks. Anything beyond
>> that should go async.
>>
>> It would be like... "DON'T MODE ME IN" for more than 20 sec :)
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>
> You should add every hour, because 20 sec every minute would obviously
> be too much
>

yeah.. but then it defeats the point: why you need to reflect
something which consumes
something like 1/1000 of total run time..

by analogy it is like turning mouse into hourglass every time VM's runs GC :)

> Nicolas
>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: 
>> http://forum.world.st/What-i-would-like-to-have-instead-of-progress-bar-tp4632707p4632824.html
>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.

Reply via email to