On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On Jun 16, 2012, at 11:42 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > If I search senders of 'foo' I do get those method that has #foo inside. > However, if I search class references to Bar, it doesn't found methods that > have something like Smalltalk at: #Bar. > > shouldn't it also find this? > > > This is not really possible. "senders of" is actually "has this symbol in > the literal array". > > the class references, it searches for class bindings in the literal array. > > But what if class references search not only in the class bindings in the literal array but also symbol (as senders do) of its name (with case sensitive) ? > both are *very* simplistic. The system is not searching for "message > sends" or "class references" at all. > > What you want would mean far more analysis, with real semantical knowledge > that is not available on that level. > > > Marcus > > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de > > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
