On Jun 17, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> On Jun 16, 2012, at 11:42 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>
> > If I search senders of 'foo' I do get those method that has #foo inside.
> > However, if I search class references to Bar, it doesn't found methods that
> > have something like Smalltalk at: #Bar.
> > shouldn't it also find this?
> >
> This is not really possible. "senders of" is actually "has this symbol in the
> literal array".
>
> the class references, it searches for class bindings in the literal array.
>
>
> But what if class references search not only in the class bindings in the
> literal array but also symbol (as senders do) of its name (with case
> sensitive) ?
>
maybe... I wonder if it will not give strange false positives...
What I would really like to have instead would be a higher level model for code
that we could query *for real*.
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
