On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected] > wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Stéphane Ducasse < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi guys >> >> PackageInfo has a large APi that is often not used. >> So I would suggest that we reduce the PackageInfo API first because it >> will lower the stress on RPackage to be offer a >> compatible interface. >> All the methods in the compatibility should somehow disappear or only >> serve as purpose to help temporary >> backwards compat. >> >> > I agree. But if you want to remove in the future PackageInfo, then > RPackage HAS to provide a way to get the classes/extension methods of a > MCPackage. That's why I need #allDefinedClasses and > #allDefinedExtensionMethods > > Unless we attack MCPackage at the same time > > > > > >> What do you think? >> >> Stef >> > > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > >
