Nautilus displays too many packages :) We will have to fix that but ben is basically waiting for me to move on RPackage but I'm burnt on it.
Stef On Aug 5, 2012, at 5:59 PM, GOUBIER Thierry wrote: > Well, what happened is that I renamed a package in Nautilus (from X-B to X-C, > knowing there was already a X-A). It moved things from X-B to X-C, and > created X as well. > > Now I erase X working copy on a regular basis (it's the Alt package you get > when you load Alt-Browser), noticing today thanks to the discussion that > RPackage was keeping a copy of Alt as well, so I unregistered it today. I > hope I finally got rid of it ! > > Thierry > > ________________________________________ > De : [email protected] > [[email protected]] de la part de Stéphane Ducasse > [[email protected]] > Date d'envoi : dimanche 5 août 2012 17:47 > À : [email protected] > Objet : Re: [Pharo-project] About the migration from PackageInfo to RPackage > > On Aug 5, 2012, at 2:54 PM, GOUBIER Thierry wrote: > >> Is this the reason why when I built my package tree in the AltBrowser, I get >> four packages (X, X-A, X-B, X-C) but X contains all the classes of X-A, X-B >> and X-C ? > > Which package classes? > because MC use a pattern matching based on category names and explicitly > MCworking copy > > So if you declare an MC package we name X and X-A indeed you are in trouble. > The point with RPackage is to avoid the pattern matching approach of MC and > to get rid of the scan of all categories. > >> Is this the reason why, in the current Alt-Browser packages, there is an >> auto-creation of an Alt package when you load it ? >> >> I also get confused by the relation between class categories and packages. >> Is there a plan to get rid of class categories ? > > yes > >> At the moment, if you create then unload a package, the system categories >> stay behind (Pharo 2.0). >> >> Thierry >> ________________________________________ > > >
