OK
so we should not talk about it anymore and ban it from all the configurations.
It would be good to have specific rules for configurations.

BTW: what do we do with the chapter I'm working on the new book and now I'm 
puzzled
because I have invested a large amount of time and I get a chapter that you 
never gave feedback on and 
that is probably not correct or up to date. So may be the only thing I can do 
is to drop it.
And after people will tell that pharo does not have documentation but I often 
fell alone. 

Stef

> #latestVersion actually has a very good reason for existing, just not for use 
> by end users in loading code ... 
> 
> It _has_ been dropped from the _convention_, and it shouldn't be dropped from 
> the code base...
> 
> Dale
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> | From: "Sven Van Caekenberghe" <[email protected]>
> | To: [email protected]
> | Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 1:02:17 PM
> | Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Metacello bleedingEdge question
> | 
> | 
> | On 29 Sep 2012, at 21:38, Stéphane Ducasse
> | <[email protected]> wrote:
> | 
> | > On Sep 29, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Dale Henrichs wrote:
> | > 
> | >> Stef,
> | >> 
> | >> #latestVersion is there for backward compatibility.
> | > 
> | > Ok
> | > I would simply remove it.
> | > 
> | > Stef
> | 
> | I was about to say: what's that 'backward compatibility' ?
> | 
> | ;-)
> | 
> | No seriously, unless there is a very good, important reason to keep
> | it, confusing stuff should be removed going forward.
> | 
> | Sven
> | 
> | --
> | Sven Van Caekenberghe
> | http://stfx.eu
> | Smalltalk is the Red Pill
> | 
> | 
> | 
> | 
> | 
> 


Reply via email to