Not sure whether or not these are doable with Slime, but they are good ideas

Dale

----- Original Message -----
| From: "Alexandre Bergel" <[email protected]>
| To: [email protected]
| Sent: Monday, October 1, 2012 1:30:44 PM
| Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Metacello bleedingEdge question
| 
| > I was thinking in terms of Slime for Seaside.
| > One PhD student is working on rule and I was thinking that it would
| > be fun to have a kind of
| > Metacello checker.
| >     do you have some rule of thumb where to look for potential
| >     problems?
| >     Because it can be a fun experience.
| 
| I had this idea of a checker for Metacello (that can be used with
| Versionner before committing), but never got the traction to do it.
| Some rules:
|   - two packages in a graph of dependencies may rely on a different
|   version of a third package
|   - identifying cycles in packages
|   - very important: checking whether the dependencies defined in
|   Metacello matches with the actual source code. Said in other
|   words, do I miss some dependencies in a configuration?
| 
| Cheers,
| Alexandre
| 
| --
| _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
| Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
| ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 

Reply via email to