On 8 October 2012 20:13, Oscar E A Callaú <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks guys for your replies. > > On Oct 8, 2012, at 15:02 , Frank Shearar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 8 October 2012 18:31, Damien Cassou <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Oscar E A Callaú <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> I'm using Aquamacs (mac UI for emacs) as my default editor. But I have a >>>> problem, when trying to read a .st file, I don't get the syntax >>>> highlighting (so all is black-&-white). How I can solve this issue? >>> >>> Pharo/Smalltalk is not meant to be coded in Emacs, you have to use >>> Pharo currently (that may change in the future). >> >> For shame, Damien. Why is Smalltalk not meant to be coded in a text >> editor? It is text, after all. Next thing you'll suggest that one >> shouldn't use git to store one's code. > > > Relax guys. I known that when programming in Pharo, it is better to use the > built-in browser, like Nautilus. However in some cases, I have a Smalltalk > file (.st) outside the image, and I just want to see the code and not > installing (file-in, compiling, …) it. That is the reason, why asking for > emacs. > you can browse the code in pharo without loading it. just drag file into image window and choose 'browse' in menu which will popup .
> Cheers. > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
