On 8 October 2012 20:08, Frank Shearar <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8 October 2012 19:02, Frank Shearar <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 8 October 2012 18:31, Damien Cassou <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Oscar E A Callaú <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> I'm using Aquamacs (mac UI for emacs) as my default editor. But I have a >>>> problem, when trying to read a .st file, I don't get the syntax >>>> highlighting (so all is black-&-white). How I can solve this issue? >>> >>> Pharo/Smalltalk is not meant to be coded in Emacs, you have to use >>> Pharo currently (that may change in the future). >> >> For shame, Damien. Why is Smalltalk not meant to be coded in a text >> editor? It is text, after all. Next thing you'll suggest that one >> shouldn't use git to store one's code. > > Alright, OK, I wrote that with at least 50% troll in the mix. (*) > There's no reason why one shouldn't be able to use standard text > manipulation techniques to hack on Smalltalk code. We simply never > bothered doing so, and I dare say that the majority of people on this > list are happy not supporting text-using tools. > > (*) OK, OK, 75%. > Being told so many times.. People still keep missing the point. Smalltalk is not just source code it is environment of live objects. Good luck manipulating live objects in emacs.
It is , of course up to you, If you prefer to code in stone age. I, personally cannot code outside image, without browser , debugger and such.. > frank > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
