well everything that beats js fsucked up semantics...
I just hear I voice in my head Array(16).join("lol" - 2) + " Batman!";
so in that matter, yes Amber good, and no javascript bad!
On 2012-10-15, at 22:02, [email protected] wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> all comparisons are unfair I know but this is only to make you guy aware of
> this (please ignore if you're already).
>
> Here is the thing:
>
> The Jeff Bezos' Electricity Metaphor:
> http://www.ted.com/talks/jeff_bezos_on_the_next_web_innovation.html
>
> Makes (probably) any smalltalker remember the Alan Kay's talk about having in
> the internet an IP for every object and spectacular computer science ideas
> like that.
>
> The js everywhere trend makes a lot of sense. Once it achieves critical mass
> it might tempt intel and friends to do some hardware accelerator for js VM's.
> Who knows. We have a long way to go but, in the meantime, all js staked
> frameworks make a lot of sense and WILL get traction because of that. Example:
>
> http://www.wakanda.org/
>
> A talk here:
> https://vimeo.com/31603156
>
> So.. the unfair question here would be:
>
> What we'll have to match that competitiveness?
>
> sebastian
>
> o/
>
> PS: Pharo + WebSockets + Amber sounds in that line doesn't?
>
