On 2012-10-16, at 15:08, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote:
> I understand that it would be nice eventually to have images saved like that > automatically. > > It is still a pity that the VM has to change for that ;-) > > But as far as I understood, the first 512 bytes are skipped today as well, > so if you (or any program) does a binary edit of the image header, it would > work, no ? exactly :) I tried it and it works out of the box... just that the header is lost on image-save so far...
