On 16 Oct 2012, at 15:17, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2012-10-16, at 15:08, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I understand that it would be nice eventually to have images saved like that >> automatically. >> >> It is still a pity that the VM has to change for that ;-) >> >> But as far as I understood, the first 512 bytes are skipped today as well, >> so if you (or any program) does a binary edit of the image header, it would >> work, no ? > > exactly :) I tried it and it works out of the box... just that the header is > lost on image-save so far... Then maybe you should share the secret ? It would not be more than a couple of linux commands, would it ;-)
