Hi, I tried MethodWrappers42 under Pharo 2.0-20370. I've got many tests turn green by simply adding CompiledMetod>>#isMwMethodWrapper that return true. Attached the mcz file.
BTW, what is the license of this project? Noury Afin de contribuer au respect de l'environnement, merci de n'imprimer ce courriel qu'en cas de necessite Please consider the environment before you print
MethodWrappers42-NouryBouraqadi.2.mcz
Description: Binary data
On 16 nov. 2012, at 10:43, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks a lot. I now created another package named MethodWrappers42 (instead > of MethodWrappers4.2). > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 15 Nov 2012, at 19:03, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 15, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We have a little problem with MethodWrappers. Currently, the package is >>> called MethodWrappers4.2 which completely messes up Monticello in Pharo 1.4. >>> >>> So, we (me and Stef) would like to rename it to MethodWrappers42, but for >>> that we need access to the repository. Marcus, could you provide this >>> access? >>> >> >> I actually don't know what state MW is in... there are multiple ports using >> multiple strategies. The 42 one is for Squeak, I think. >> >> I added you, after fighting with SqueakSource (Stef I could not find in the >> list) >> >> Marcus >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de >> > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Don't give to get. Just give." > > > > > > Noury Bouraqadi Ecole des Mines de Douai http://car.mines-douai.fr/noury --
