MIT Stef
On Nov 19, 2012, at 5:12 PM, Noury Bouraqadi wrote: > Hi, > > I tried MethodWrappers42 under Pharo 2.0-20370. > I've got many tests turn green by simply adding > CompiledMetod>>#isMwMethodWrapper that return true. > Attached the mcz file. > > BTW, what is the license of this project? > > Noury > > > > > Afin de contribuer au respect de l'environnement, > > > merci de n'imprimer ce courriel qu'en cas de necessite > > > > > > Please consider the environment before you print > > > > > > <MethodWrappers42-NouryBouraqadi.2.mcz> > On 16 nov. 2012, at 10:43, Tudor Girba wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Thanks a lot. I now created another package named MethodWrappers42 (instead >> of MethodWrappers4.2). >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> On 15 Nov 2012, at 19:03, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Nov 15, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> We have a little problem with MethodWrappers. Currently, the package is >>>> called MethodWrappers4.2 which completely messes up Monticello in Pharo >>>> 1.4. >>>> >>>> So, we (me and Stef) would like to rename it to MethodWrappers42, but for >>>> that we need access to the repository. Marcus, could you provide this >>>> access? >>>> >>> >>> I actually don't know what state MW is in... there are multiple ports >>> using multiple strategies. The 42 one is for Squeak, I think. >>> >>> I added you, after fighting with SqueakSource (Stef I could not find in the >>> list) >>> >>> Marcus >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de >>> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Don't give to get. Just give." >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Noury Bouraqadi > Ecole des Mines de Douai > http://car.mines-douai.fr/noury > -- > > >
