On Dec 11, 2012, at 9:51 AM, Pavel Krivanek <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > I would like to ask: should NativeBoost be part of the Pharo Kernel? I would say right now, no. > Currently there are some minor issues like that AsmJit-Extension package > takes ownership of Integer>>#&, False>>#asBit and so on. > Will NativeBoost be more closely integrated with the kernel in the near > future? > In the far future, native boost will provide the basis to move more things out of the VM into the image. When this happens, yes, it has to be part of the kernel. But that is far away for now. > BTW, we need to integrate > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7062 before any update that > will move methods between packages. > We should continue to regularly integrate fixes… it would help a lot if someone that is not me would sometimes look at submitted fixes. Marcus
