Igor metacello can handle this situation and there is a doc. We can give a try together. but this is not like we do not have the tool at hand.
Stef On Dec 11, 2012, at 3:30 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote: > On 11 December 2012 09:51, Pavel Krivanek <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to ask: should NativeBoost be part of the Pharo Kernel? >> Currently there are some minor issues like that AsmJit-Extension package >> takes ownership of Integer>>#&, False>>#asBit and so on. > > This is because 1.4 don't have those methods, while 2.0. has (added by > Camillo).. > and so, currently , NB can either work on both, by making 2.0 image dirty > or work only in 2.0, and fail to work in 1.4 because of "missing" methods. > > I am not very good in metacello-fu to write a confing, which will > select various set of stuff to load > depending on image version. > So, if someone can help, i would appreciate that. > I can move those methods into NB-pharo-1.4 package.. > > >> Will NativeBoost be >> more closely integrated with the kernel in the near future? >> > depends on what you putting into "kernel". > if it is "a basic functionality, which is absolutely required to do > anything else", > then no, it will be never part of a kernel. > > if it is " a set of functionality, ready to use for most common/daily > tasks" , then yes > it should be part of such kernel.. > > >> BTW, we need to integrate >> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7062 before any update that >> will move methods between packages. >> >> Cheers, >> -- Pavel > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. >
