it seems that #layout is expecting a LayoutFrame as argument.
But since I do not know what Stef and Igor changed (and what they didn't fix
^^) I can't tell more than that :s
And I do not have too much time right now, sorry
Ben
On Jan 8, 2013, at 4:05 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
> It does in plugin specs, for example
>
> defaultSpec
>
> ^{ #ComposableSpec.
> #vResizing:. #shrinkWrap.
> #add:. {{self. #textModel}.
> #layout:. #(0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0)}.
> }
>
> -- Pavel
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Benjamin
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Can you show me your SpecLayout please ?
>>
>>
>> Ben
>>
>> On Jan 8, 2013, at 3:57 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Stef,
>>>
>>> get it here:
>>>
>>> Gofer new
>>> smalltalkhubUser: 'PavelKrivanek' project: 'Periscope';
>>> package: 'Periscope';
>>> load.
>>>
>>> activate with:
>>>
>>> Nautilus pluginClasses add: {(Smalltalk at: #NautilusPeriscopePlugin).
>>> #none} .
>>>
>>> I tried to change it to the array form but it doesn't help. This is
>>> the error stack:
>>>
>>> #('Array(Object)' 'doesNotUnderstand: #layoutFrame:')
>>> #('SpecInterpreter' 'actionToPerformWithSelector:arguments:')
>>> #('SpecInterpreter' 'interpretASpec:')
>>> #('SpecInterpreter' 'interpretASpec:model:superSpec:')
>>> #('SpecInterpreter class' 'private_interpretASpec:model:superSpec:')
>>> #('[...] in SpecInterpreter' 'interpretASpec:')
>>> #('Array(SequenceableCollection)' 'collect:')
>>> #('SpecInterpreter' 'interpretASpec:')
>>> #('SpecInterpreter' 'interpretASpec:model:superSpec:')
>>> #('SpecInterpreter class' 'private_interpretASpec:model:superSpec:')
>>> #('SpecInterpreter' 'retreiveSpecFrom:')
>>> #('SpecInterpreter' 'interpretASpec:')
>>> #('SpecInterpreter' 'interpretASpec:model:superSpec:')
>>> #('SpecInterpreter class' 'private_interpretASpec:model:superSpec:')
>>> #('[...] in SpecInterpreter' 'interpretASpec:')
>>> #('Array(SequenceableCollection)' 'collect:')
>>> #('SpecInterpreter' 'interpretASpec:')
>>> #('SpecInterpreter' 'interpretASpec:model:superSpec:')
>>> #('SpecInterpreter class' 'private_interpretASpec:model:superSpec:')
>>> #('SpecInterpreter class' 'interpretASpec:model:superSpec:')
>>>
>>> -- Pavel
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Ben,
>>>>>
>>>>> trying to run Periscope on the latest Pharo image, I see that
>>>>> everything is broken again. Please, start to write some documentation
>>>>> about Spec development, what have you changed, what do you plan to
>>>>> change, what are the new prefered ways to write UI specification and
>>>>> how to migrate old code. At least write some short mails here.
>>>>
>>>> Hi pavel
>>>>
>>>> where is your code?
>>>> Because we did a massive refactoring with igor to free layoutFrame users
>>>> from the tyranny of fractions:offset:
>>>>
>>>> so you can have a look at some spec in the latest 20 and you will see that
>>>> now
>>>> we use
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> #layout: . #(0 0 1 1 0 22 0 0)
>>>>
>>>> when it was
>>>> #layout:
>>>> {#LayoutFrame . #fractions:offsets:. (0@0 corner:
>>>> 1@0). (0@0 corner: 0@20).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now may be LayoutFrame should not be in morphic so that Spec is
>>>> independent from Morphic but for now we prefered to avoid
>>>> to have reference to LayoutFrame and more important use of
>>>> #fractions:offsets:
>>>>
>>>> Esteban will start to work on a UIBuilder because we do not want to have
>>>> to code such methods and he will do a pass on Spec.
>>>> After we will stabilize it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I know, it is a lot of work but we cannot write tools and bindings to
>>>>> other user interface if the basic UI framework is undocumented and
>>>>> changing silently.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> -- Pavel
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
