On 2013-01-08, at 18:01, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote:

> anyway, even if there are easier ways to create references, I think Jimmie is 
> right, there are inconsistencies in the protocol. 
> maybe for 3.0?

yes definitely :).

Jimmie, maybe you can open an issue on code.google.com/p/pharo/? 
with a complete list of the methods you find confusing?

Reply via email to