+1

>> anyway, even if there are easier ways to create references, I think Jimmie 
>> is right, there are inconsistencies in the protocol. 
>> maybe for 3.0?
> 
> yes definitely :).
> 
> Jimmie, maybe you can open an issue on code.google.com/p/pharo/? 
> with a complete list of the methods you find confusing?


Reply via email to