On 5 December 2012 22:33, Frank Shearar <[email protected]> wrote:
> The attached bootstraps Metacello and Gofer if they're not already
> present. (They're not, in Squeak.)
>
> Offline loading - loading without a network connection - doesn't quite
> work yet; I couldn't chase down the nil. But with a network connection
> it works just fine.

Even though I haven't nailed the offline loading, given that this
configuration fixes the described issue and works when you _do_ have
an internet connection, who should I talk to about getting this merged
in?

frank

> frank
>
> On 4 December 2012 22:19, Frank Shearar <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Thanks Camillo, that's done the trick.
>>
>> I've found _another_ problems with the configuration, but that I can
>> fix. (The configuration only works if you have a network connection.)
>> I'll hopefully post a fix in the very near future.
>>
>> frank
>>
>> On 4 December 2012 21:54, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> hard to guess if I don't know the project :P
>>> for me it worked you have all the parsing capabilities minus the debug UIs
>>>
>>> On 2012-12-04, at 18:51, Nicolas Cellier 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oh, I see a minimal Petit... But isn't that going to be too small?
>>>> Alternatively why not a ConfigurationOfGrosParser ?
>>>>
>>>> Nicolas
>>>>
>>>> 2012/12/4 Camillo Bruni <[email protected]>:
>>>>> just load the minimal group and you're fine. That's what we do in 2.0 as 
>>>>> well...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2012-12-04, at 18:32, Frank Shearar <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> By "broken" I mean "it might work fine in Pharo but it doesn't in 
>>>>>> Squeak".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's because PetitParser now uses Glamour, which pulls in a whole
>>>>>> host of things that probably don't work in Squeak. (I don't know, I
>>>>>> haven't tried, but these are all UI things, and the UI is where Pharo
>>>>>> and Squeak are least compatible.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm being a bit rude in that I don't yet have a fix for the issue.
>>>>>> Ideally, a ConfigurationOf would have Pharo specific stuff and Squeak
>>>>>> specific stuff in separate sections, with only the shared things
>>>>>> (right now, not Glamour, nor its dependents) in the #'common' section.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, if someone doesn't beat me to it, I'll submit a fix soon,
>>>>>> once Squeak 4.4 is out the door.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> frank
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to