On 17 January 2013 09:53, Frank Shearar <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5 December 2012 22:33, Frank Shearar <[email protected]> wrote: >> The attached bootstraps Metacello and Gofer if they're not already >> present. (They're not, in Squeak.) >> >> Offline loading - loading without a network connection - doesn't quite >> work yet; I couldn't chase down the nil. But with a network connection >> it works just fine. > > Even though I haven't nailed the offline loading, given that this > configuration fixes the described issue and works when you _do_ have > an internet connection, who should I talk to about getting this merged > in?
*ping* Who's responsible for the PetitParser repository? Does Lukas still hang out here, or should I just mail him directly? > frank > >> frank >> >> On 4 December 2012 22:19, Frank Shearar <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Thanks Camillo, that's done the trick. >>> >>> I've found _another_ problems with the configuration, but that I can >>> fix. (The configuration only works if you have a network connection.) >>> I'll hopefully post a fix in the very near future. >>> >>> frank >>> >>> On 4 December 2012 21:54, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> hard to guess if I don't know the project :P >>>> for me it worked you have all the parsing capabilities minus the debug UIs >>>> >>>> On 2012-12-04, at 18:51, Nicolas Cellier >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Oh, I see a minimal Petit... But isn't that going to be too small? >>>>> Alternatively why not a ConfigurationOfGrosParser ? >>>>> >>>>> Nicolas >>>>> >>>>> 2012/12/4 Camillo Bruni <[email protected]>: >>>>>> just load the minimal group and you're fine. That's what we do in 2.0 as >>>>>> well... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2012-12-04, at 18:32, Frank Shearar <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> By "broken" I mean "it might work fine in Pharo but it doesn't in >>>>>>> Squeak". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's because PetitParser now uses Glamour, which pulls in a whole >>>>>>> host of things that probably don't work in Squeak. (I don't know, I >>>>>>> haven't tried, but these are all UI things, and the UI is where Pharo >>>>>>> and Squeak are least compatible.) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm being a bit rude in that I don't yet have a fix for the issue. >>>>>>> Ideally, a ConfigurationOf would have Pharo specific stuff and Squeak >>>>>>> specific stuff in separate sections, with only the shared things >>>>>>> (right now, not Glamour, nor its dependents) in the #'common' section. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> However, if someone doesn't beat me to it, I'll submit a fix soon, >>>>>>> once Squeak 4.4 is out the door. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> frank >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>
