do you have a list =of features that have been added?
that are planned?


> Dear Stephane,
>   as Jan says, we had a good pair-programming session on SUnit in Glasgow.  
> (I hope we'll have another when time permits.)  I also have some stuff not 
> yet in the OR (follow-on from my 10-min talk in Ghent) that improves/exploits 
> TestResources.  I am working to get this stuff visible so the community can 
> comment (and porting help would be great too).  It's been very busy here - 
> and a month-long illness I had after Christmas has not helped.
> 
> > Points that I reported in 2009
> 
> Were these at an ESUG (in which case I should have notes) or somewhere else.  
> I note what you say about test-state-when-committing (would need 
> repository-specific implementations; one for Store, one for Monticello, ... ?)
> 
> If any list of SUnit wishes is on the web somewhere that I should be 
> (re)reading, by all means email (to the above email address for this topic) 
> to remind me.  My aim for soon (ideally for end-March, but I've lots to do - 
> the illness put me behind) is to make the current work visible, after which 
> more can be looked at.
> 
>         Looking forward to Annecy
>               Niall Ross
> 
> 
>>> Not entirely true. In Barcelona, me and Niall merged some of stx fixes into 
>>> SUnit 4.0 and Niall spent a __lot__ of time questioning people
>>> behind various dialects to find out what he could cleanup.
>>> 
>>> Last summer, we had a coding session and started with 'to-be-5.0' by
>>> integrating St/X SUnit (based on 4.0) and SUnitToo. St/X changes mainly
>>> involves better support for interactive and reporting tools (such as one 
>>> that generates JUnit-style reports), refactoring to ease customization
>>> and changes to allow integration with other testing frameworks (like JUnit 
>>> and GNU Testlet, mainly used by STX:LIBJAVA).
>>> 
>>> During last ESUG's CS Niall finished the merge in VW and I have to merge it 
>>> back to St/X. My shame, this haven't happened yet - no time. I should do it.
>>> 
>>> So, feel free to go to Cincom's Public Repository and have look at Niall's 
>>> last development version and see now "nothing" look like :-)
>>>   
>> 
>> 
>> Good to know. This is still strange that nobody ever contacted us. I have no 
>> idea about integration/creation of points that I reported in 2009. I do not 
>> know if there is a list of features that I have been considered and/or 
>> integrated.
>> For example knowing if the test were green when the application/tests were 
>> committed.
>> 
>> Now when there will be a real release we will see if we port it. May be 
>> being able to load the two versions side by side would be good. 
>> 
>> Stef
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to