What about making level an object? log: messageString atLevel: levelObject
-- Best regards, Dennis Schetinin 2013/5/6 Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com> > Hello. > > What about logging levels? > > I like "logInfo:", "logDebug:", "logTrace:". Or maybe it is better to > split log with levels: "self log info:", "self log debug:", "self log > trace:" > > Best regards, > Denis > > > 2013/5/5 Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> > >> Hi guys >> >> Stupidly I introduced log: a while ago to replace Transcript show:. Now >> is the current situation. >> >> I still want to remove all the use of Transcript show: >> >> Now since I thought I did a mistake with log: because it overload >> Integer>>log: I introduced trace: and traceCr: >> >> Now I do not like traceCr: because it is not a cool message. >> >> So what do we do: >> >> 1) we use crLog:, logCr: >> and deprecated log: >> >> >> 2) we use crTrace:, trace: and traceCr: >> >> I really prefer solution 1 but I would like to hear from you. >> >> Stef >> > >
