On May 7, 2013, at 5:19 PM, Andrei Vasile Chis <chisvasileand...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Given that SmalltalkHub is now stable we were considering to discontinue 
> SqueakSource. 
> Our idea is to provide a grace period of a couple of months to allow the 
> current active users to migrate their projects to the new service and then 
> simply put squeaksource in read-only mode (simply exposing the directory 
> structure and allowing downloads).
> 
> What do you think about it ?
> Are there any good reasons to still keep SqueakSource alive? 

Keep it alive so that we can slowly migrate. Because migrating takes a lot of 
time.



> 
> Cheers,
> The SCG Team


Reply via email to