On May 7, 2013, at 5:19 PM, Andrei Vasile Chis <chisvasileand...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > Given that SmalltalkHub is now stable we were considering to discontinue > SqueakSource. > Our idea is to provide a grace period of a couple of months to allow the > current active users to migrate their projects to the new service and then > simply put squeaksource in read-only mode (simply exposing the directory > structure and allowing downloads). > > What do you think about it ? > Are there any good reasons to still keep SqueakSource alive? Keep it alive so that we can slowly migrate. Because migrating takes a lot of time. > > Cheers, > The SCG Team