We were thinking of keeping the current image alive for one or two more months. Then replace it with just a simple view of the file system.
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:50 AM, stephane ducasse <stephane.duca...@free.fr>wrote: > > On May 7, 2013, at 5:19 PM, Andrei Vasile Chis <chisvasileand...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Given that SmalltalkHub is now stable we were considering to discontinue > SqueakSource. > > Our idea is to provide a grace period of a couple of months to allow the > current active users to migrate their projects to the new service and then > simply put squeaksource in read-only mode (simply exposing the directory > structure and allowing downloads). > > > > What do you think about it ? > > Are there any good reasons to still keep SqueakSource alive? > > Keep it alive so that we can slowly migrate. Because migrating takes a lot > of time. > > > > > > > Cheers, > > The SCG Team > > >
