On May 2, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Ted F.A. van Gaalen wrote: > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Norbert Hartl <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Am 02.05.2011 um 18:49 schrieb Ted F.A. van Gaalen: >> >>> Assume that throughout this all coding are countless >>> references to classes that are perfectly normal at the >>> time of writing. This no exception. >>> >> Well, if you stay in this "time of writing" (meaning same vm, same image) >> everything should be fine. > > (A) I would always want to move my packages to newer releases because > they [might] have better performance due to more optimized core > classes ?(in addition to the VM performance)
You'll want to upgrade to benefit from performance gains that result from removing the cruft and creating a lean and mean core class library? That seems at odds with the "please don't change the core class library" line of thought. Pat
