Yes, but a bit simplified: As a "typical application programmer" I consider myself as a "pharo-user" (that is why I am here.) Pharo/Smalltalk I really like as an application development tool. made by people like you (grateful, thanks), who dive deeper in Pharo "itself", so to speak So that is why I come with typical "user" questions and long term thoughts about usability and so on. Simply said: I wont' touch much of the "deeper world" in the image, but put my own application object layer on it. That is so nice about Smalltalk. (not making any money with it, I am outta work at the moment :o|
- On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2 May 2011 22:59, Ted F.A. van Gaalen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Igor >> ?? Shouldn't I be writing >> Pharo/Seaside apps with it? >> I am definitely a *user* Of Pharo/Seaside if I do.. > > hmm.. i don't know.. i were always thinking that those who writing > applications are developers, > and those who using applications, who don't understand what program > is, what is the code, and how it works are users.. > but maybe times had changed and now writing an application no longer > means that you are developer, > but just some kind of power-user? :) > >> Regards >> Ted >> >> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Ramon Leon <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> El lun, 02-05-2011 a las 22:43 +0200, Igor Stasenko escribió: >>>>> >>>>> Pharo is end-user application for developers, not for users :) >>> >>> +1, that's why I prefer Pharo over Squeak. >>> >>> -- >>> Ramon Leon >>> http://onsmalltalk.com >>> >>> >> >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko AKA sig. > >
