On Jan 29, 2013, at 8:09 AM, Peter H. Meadows <[email protected]> wrote:
> But isn't squeak MIT license now? And OpenQwaq uses squeak. So I don't see
> why we couldn't in theory port it to Pharo (not that anyone is going to any
> time soon; I'm told it would be a lot of work).
>
But who would invest his life into this is the resulting code base is GPL and
can't server as the foundation
to build my/our/the future?
Marcus
