I would. It would be a nice thing for the community to have. (Plus I'm an anarchist so I don't care what the law says. I only care about behaving in an ethical way. But this isn't the list for philosophy :-)
But I think porting OQ is beyond my skill level at the moment :( I suppose people who think only MIT code is worth spending time on could port OpenCobalt to Pharo.. that would be nice... On 29 January 2013 07:17, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 29, 2013, at 8:09 AM, Peter H. Meadows < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > But isn't squeak MIT license now? And OpenQwaq uses squeak. So I don't > see why we couldn't in theory port it to Pharo (not that anyone is going to > any time soon; I'm told it would be a lot of work). > > > > But who would invest his life into this is the resulting code base is GPL > and can't server as the foundation > to build my/our/the future? > > Marcus >
