Hey!

On 04/06/2013 04:40 PM, Dennis Schetinin wrote:
Why Pharo or Squeak don't have a framework (based on Fuel for example)
that allows to control changes, execute transaction, save some parts of
image instead of whole image etc.? This could be less efficient then
GemStone, but loadable on demand, customizable and usable in smaller
projects. Maybe there's such a project living already? Or is it too much
for modern Smalltalk?

I already posted about such a project in this thread, Oak, why didn't you notice?:

http://goran.krampe.se/2012/12/29/oak/

It's not complaining. I know the answer: there's no usable persistence
solution because I didn't create it :)  I just want to know if someone
else thinks the same way as I do?

Feel free to help out with Oak. It is exactly what you are asking for.

regards, Göran

Reply via email to