Sorry for such a late answer, I was away for some time and have just managed to break through the piles of e-mails. :)
If I'm not mistaken, Oak is based on Riak, i.e. external storage engine. Actually, I was talking about Smalltalk-based solution. Why do you prefer an “externally supported backend”? -- Best regards, Dennis Schetinin 2013/4/8 Göran Krampe <[email protected]> > Hey! > > > On 04/06/2013 04:40 PM, Dennis Schetinin wrote: > >> Why Pharo or Squeak don't have a framework (based on Fuel for example) >> that allows to control changes, execute transaction, save some parts of >> image instead of whole image etc.? This could be less efficient then >> GemStone, but loadable on demand, customizable and usable in smaller >> projects. Maybe there's such a project living already? Or is it too much >> for modern Smalltalk? >> > > I already posted about such a project in this thread, Oak, why didn't you > notice?: > > http://goran.krampe.se/2012/**12/29/oak/<http://goran.krampe.se/2012/12/29/oak/> > > > It's not complaining. I know the answer: there's no usable persistence >> solution because I didn't create it :) I just want to know if someone >> else thinks the same way as I do? >> > > Feel free to help out with Oak. It is exactly what you are asking for. > > regards, Göran > >
