On Sep 4, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >> We are in the process of fixing them, but have not fixed all yet. I always >> thought that we would >> back port when we have fixed the problem completely in 3.0 > > I'm not sure what we are seeing in pharo3 is the same problem reported in > pharo2. > Of course if it is, we will backport. > But "inflation" problem in ph3 is very consistent and repeatable, the problem > reported in ph2... well, I never seen it before, and we have just one report > (and I assume that we have more than one hundred production projects with > that version). > So is likely something different (also some of the detected leaks are due to > changes in ph3, not present in the older version). >
Yes, the problem in Pharo2 seems to be related purely to morph extensions
hanging around.
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11290/There-are-far-more-instances-of-MorphExtension-than-Morph
(yes, I should have added a parent case for "back port to 2.0").
Marcus
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
