Thanks Guillaume.
It works well.

With BabyMock2, the syntax is 
=> aBlock

Le 9 avr. 2014 à 11:13, Guillaume Larcheveque a écrit :

> I think you can have your mock send an exception by using #answers:aBlock and 
> signal the exception in the block
> 
> 
> 2014-04-08 15:58 GMT+02:00 Christophe Demarey <christophe.dema...@inria.fr>:
> Hello,
> 
> Thanks. Very nice library!
> 
> I have a question: is it possible to expect a method to throw an Exception?
> 
> I would like something like:
>         protocol describe
>                 once: mock recv: #aMethod ;
>                 signal: anError.
> I did not find anything in the documentation.
> 
> I don't want to test that the mock signals an error but I want to test a code 
> that needs to take into account an exception.
> 
> Best regards,
> Christophe.
> 
> Le 11 mars 2014 à 12:30, Attila Magyar a écrit :
> 
> > I'm pleased to announce the 2.0 version of BabyMock. BabyMock is a visual
> > mock object library that supports test-driven development.
> >
> > This version has a new syntax which is incompatible with the old version.
> > Therefore it has a new repository
> > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~zeroflag/BabyMock2
> > (BabyMock 1 is still available at its old location, but in the future I'd to
> > focus on the development of BabyMock2, so don't expect too many changes
> > regarding the old version).
> >
> > Changes in 2.0
> >
> > - A new, extensible DSL (no more should/can)
> > - Improved error messages, history of messages, detailed information about
> > argument mismatches
> > - An improved, Spec based GUI
> > - Clicking on a mock opens an inspector on the expectations
> > - Clicking on a message opens an inspector on the message
> > - Object methods can be mocked by defaults
> > - Blocks can be executed after receiving a message by the mock. The block
> > has access to the arguments of the incoming message.
> > - Any argument matcher
> > - Cleanups and simplifications in the code
> >
> > I hope you don't mind the changes regarding the syntax. Personally I think
> > it has lot more pros than cons.
> >
> > More information
> >
> > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~zeroflag/BabyMock2
> >
> > p.s.
> > It needs Pharo3.0.
> >
> > Attila
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context: 
> > http://forum.world.st/ANN-BabyMock-2-tp4748530.html
> > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Guillaume Larcheveque
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to