> On 28 Mar 2015, at 20:05, Johan Fabry <jfa...@dcc.uchile.cl> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Mar 28, 2015, at 08:06, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Le 28/3/15 08:53, Marcus Denker a écrit :
>>> I think we have not yet any good API for this… one problem is that the 
>>> .changes is not only a transaction log, but in addition
>>> the place where the source of a method is stored.
>>> 
>>> I would like to
>>> 
>>> -> make transaction log + source storage independent.
>>> -> add a kind of “virtual” package for these generated entities so that 
>>> there is no package that gets dirty when generating code
>>>    reflectively
>>> -> have a good API so one can distinguishes “system notifications are send” 
>>> from “change is logged” and “source is stored”.
>> 
>> + 1
> 
> +1 for that also. Priority for Pharo 5 ?
> 

Yes!

        Marcus

Reply via email to