Oy. I am so sorry. :-/ I would drop that box down and my gaze stopped at
the license I ultimately had in mind. Thanks.
On 6/16/2016 2:06 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
On 16 Jun 2016, at 03:42, Mark Bratcher <mdbra...@gmail.com
<mailto:mdbra...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Does anyone know on what part of this project setup screen on
smalltalkhub.com <http://smalltalkhub.com> does one set the project
to be "private"? I see the checkbox that determines whether it is
publicly writable, but I don't see one that marks it publicly
unreadable. I hear the capability exists.
http://i.stack.imgur.com/8wRN9.jpg
I'm sure it's something silly/simple and I'm just not seeing it.
yeah, simple but not evident (because capability was added in last
moment).
Is in the “licence” combo box.
Esteban
Thanks
Mark
On 06/15/2016 10:06 AM, Mark Bratcher wrote:
A couple of easy ones:
1) Does smalltalkhub.com <http://smalltalkhub.com/> support private
projects (used, e.g., for CI)? I've seen a couple of posts on
random forums dating back a couple of years indicating that it did,
but when I went to create a project, I didn't see an option to make
it private.
2) Is Squeaksource 3 (http://ss3.gemtalksystems.com/ss) currently
maintained? It still says "public alpha" and latest comments
anywhere or submissions to their tracker are old. Who is the
current owner?
