2018-02-11 20:36 GMT+01:00 Hernán Morales Durand <hernan.mora...@gmail.com>:

> 2018-02-11 16:10 GMT-03:00 Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com>:
> > Hi Hernan.
> >
> > 2018-02-11 19:57 GMT+01:00 Hernán Morales Durand <
> hernan.mora...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >> Hi Denis
> >>
> >> 2018-02-10 15:18 GMT-03:00 Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com>:
> >> >
> >> > 2018-02-10 20:59 GMT+03:00 Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com
> >:
> >> >>
> >> >> Please to not use an unary on Symbol
> >> >> Dispatch on something.
> >> >>
> >> >> self class environment at: #Array
> >> >> is the best
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > We should not use collection API for reflection calls. It makes them
> >> > very
> >> > difficult to find. Let's use explicit names like:
> >> >
> >>
> >> Sorry I do not see it.
> >>
> >> The Collection API is beautiful, why couldn't be used for reflection?
> >
> >
> > We have around 3000 senders of #at: message in the image. Do you think
> it is
> > easy to filter reflective calls?
> >
>
> I still don't understand your use case, nor how the #at: is related
> with the #asClass issue.
>
> Do you mean **further** filtering for relflective sends?
>
> Does this affects common-usage beyond Browser development?
>

The Stef proposal was that we should never use #asClass in the code. It is
fine for scripting but not for the domain code by many reasons which were
discussed here and at the past.

But I only commented the proposed replacement:

self class environment at: #Object


If you do not like it, it is different story. I just described problem with
#at: message:

We already replaced many #asClass users with this code. And now it is quite
difficult to find such places. They all hidden inside 3000 senders of #at:.
If we will use #classNamed: instead of #at: then simple senders query will
easily detect all reflective calls.
(we probably already use it but not in all places).


>
> >>
> >> I have no trouble finding #asClass senders, implementors, etc.
> >>
> >> What do you want to find?
> >>
> >> > self class environment classNamed: #Array
> >> >
> >>
> >> Too much typing :)
> >>
> >> >
> >> > From the other side we all agree that #asClass is super handy method.
> >> > And we
> >> > can fix it to respect sender environment using thisContext. It will
> >> > affects
> >> > performance but with our super powerful metalinks it can be easily
> >> > cached
> >> > (#asMethodConst is implemented that way).
> >> > So we can make environment completely transparent for users.
> >> >
> >> > Best regards,
> >> > Denis
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> For Modules, we made progress and got bitten by many issues and
> >> >> teaching
> >> >> load.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Stef
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Clément Bera <
> bera.clem...@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 4:34 PM, Hernán Morales Durand
> >> >> > <hernan.mora...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Hi Clément,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> First time I read about modules in Pharo.
> >> >> >> What is a module exactly?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> What's the problem to solve?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > It's similar to namespaces with some different, arguably better,
> >> >> > features.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Honestly I am not the expert on it so I would like some one else to
> >> >> > answer.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Among other things, it solves the problem of having 2 classes with
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > same
> >> >> > name (avoiding the prefixes we have like in C). But reportedly
> that's
> >> >> > just a
> >> >> > side-effect and not the main problem to solve.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Hernán
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 2018-02-10 9:47 GMT-03:00 Clément Bera <bera.clem...@gmail.com>:
> >> >> >> > Hi,
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > In short, everything that is not namespace/module compatible
> will
> >> >> >> > be
> >> >> >> > deprecated/changed/removed in the future, so it is not
> recommended
> >> >> >> > to
> >> >> >> > use
> >> >> >> > it.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > a.2) #Array asClassInEnvironment: Smalltalk globals
> >> >> >> > b.1) Smalltalk globals at: #Array
> >> >> >> > => Ok-ish, note that you may need to change 'Smalltalk globals'
> >> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> > namespace/module when support for those will be added since
> Array
> >> >> >> > will
> >> >> >> > be in
> >> >> >> > a module.
> >> >> >> > Maybe you want instead to use instead:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > c) self class environment at: #Array
> >> >> >> > => this will work in the future if your code is a class which
> >> >> >> > environment/namespace/module includes the Array class you would
> >> >> >> > expect
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > a.1) #Array asClass
> >> >> >> > b.2) Smalltalk at: #Array
> >> >> >> > b.3) Smalltalk classNamed: #Array
> >> >> >> > => In which namespace/module are you looking for #Array ? In the
> >> >> >> > future
> >> >> >> > this
> >> >> >> > may be removed, alternatively it will work only for globals but
> >> >> >> > not
> >> >> >> > globals
> >> >> >> > inside namespace/module which won't work since Array will be in
> a
> >> >> >> > module.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Peter Uhnák <
> i.uh...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Hi,
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> what is the canonical way to get a class from a symbol?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> a) Converting symbol into class via string protocol
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> a.1) #Array asClass
> >> >> >> >> I use this the most, because it is easy, uses unary selector,
> and
> >> >> >> >> so
> >> >> >> >> far
> >> >> >> >> I've never ran into any issues. But apparently it is not good
> --
> >> >> >> >> why?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> a.2) #Array asClassInEnvironment: Smalltalk globals
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> b) Retriving the class by key from the system dictionary
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> b.1) Smalltalk globals at: #Array
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> b.2) Smalltalk at: #Array
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> b.3) Smalltalk classNamed: #Array
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> c) something else entirely?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> I get that using #asClass wouldn't work if there was a
> different
> >> >> >> >> environment, however I don't even know in what situation there
> >> >> >> >> could
> >> >> >> >> be
> >> >> >> >> a
> >> >> >> >> different environment, so I cannot assert how problematic it is
> >> >> >> >> or
> >> >> >> >> isn't.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> >> >> Peter
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > --
> >> >> >> > Clément Béra
> >> >> >> > Pharo consortium engineer
> >> >> >> > https://clementbera.wordpress.com/
> >> >> >> > Bâtiment B 40, avenue Halley 59650 Villeneuve d'Ascq
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Clément Béra
> >> >> > Pharo consortium engineer
> >> >> > https://clementbera.wordpress.com/
> >> >> > Bâtiment B 40, avenue Halley 59650 Villeneuve d'Ascq
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to