Dear all,

In a change to our planned program, the last Serious Metaphysics session of 
this term will feature Professor Rae Langton (MIT), speaking on 
'Humility and Co-existence in Kant and Lewis: Two Modal Themes, with 
Variations' - abstract below.

We'll meet at 12pm in the Philosophy Faculty Board Room, and the session 
will run for one hour. I hope to see many of you there.

Best,
Emily

__________________

ABSTRACT


What could Immanuel Kant and David Lewis have in common? At first sight, 
little enough, given that Kant did more than most to chasten the ambitions 
of metaphysics, and Lewis did more than most to indulge them. Nevertheless 
I want to pursue here two common themes: first, an argument about ignorance 
of things in themselves, viewed as a kind of epistemic humility, having its 
source in the metaphysically contingent relation between certain classes of 
properties; and second, an argument-perhaps even a 'transcendental' 
argument-about the conditions of co-existence, the relation that 
world-mates bear to each other. Kant thinks we are ignorant of things 'in 
themselves': much is known to us, but things 'in themselves'-the intrinsic 
properties of things-remain hidden. Lewis agrees ('Ramseyan Humility'). The 
second theme of co-existence was an enduring topic of interest for Kant. In 
early work, he explored the metaphysically necessary conditions of 
co-existence, and later, the 'transcendentally' necessary conditions of our 
experience of co-existence. It provides the occasion for a further, 
surprising, commonality with Lewis. It is not too far-fetched to interpret 
Lewis as offering an argument comparable to Kant's-perhaps even a 
'transcendental' argument-about the necessity of certain conditions for 
co-existence.What emerges is a Lewis who is more like Kant than you might 
have thought: a Lewis who is interested in the necessary, perhaps 
'transcendentally' necessary, conditions for co-existence; who denies 
knowledge of things in themselves; and who lays this ignorance at the door 
of a contingent connection between intrinsic and relational facts, somehow 
conceived.




_____________________________________________________
Sent by the CamPhilEvents mailing list. To unsubscribe 
or change your membership options, please visit the list 
information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

Posts are archived here: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Reply via email to