On 04/27/2010 04:57 PM, Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
In fact, I would posit that unless lhs.opEquals and rhs.opEquals
point to the exact same function, transitivity can be unwittingly
broken.  Actually, you could use this check instead of checking the
typeinfos are equal when determining if you can call just one
function because it covers more ground.

Good point. So now it looks like opEquals is too flexible, not too inflexible :o).

Andrei
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

Reply via email to